Cracking the MS Code
  • HOME
  • Blog
  • About
  • Our Project
  • GET INVOLVED

Do microbes cause MS? what 2021 taught us

12/27/2021

0 Comments

 
Let’s do a 2021 roundup, a roundup of what we already know about MS, and what we hope to learn about this disease. 

​In prior blogs, we have shown and discussed the research results from our lab. This effort began in 2013 with a grant from the National MS Society, which continued through 2017. Since that time, we have developed and patented a spinal fluid test that focuses on possible triggers of demyelination – that is, the cause of MS. We’ll start our year-end roundup with data already gathered, shift to a habanero thought experiment, and then explore how MS is like and unlike other diseases.
Picture
Picture
Here are the most important things we already know about MS (established facts):
  • MS is a disease that is associated with broad activation of the human immune system. That is, all arms of the immune system are activated including antibodies, cells, and complement (a part of the innate immune system).
    • Among these, antibodies are the easiest to isolate and study. Most MS patients (~ 90%) have “oligoclonal bands” in their spinal fluid. These “bands” are enriched IgG-type antibodies that are relatively unique compared to the blood. These “intrathecal” (i.e. made within the brain and/or spinal cord) antibodies are believed by some to be directed at the cause of the disease.
  • MS plaques (i.e. brain and spinal cord lesions) are full of macrophages. This appearance been called “seas of macrophages”. Macrophage are immune system cells capable of engulfing and absorbing bacteria and smaller cells and particles. They are often found at sites of infection.
    • Myelin loss (demyelination) and regeneration (remyelination) are often found within these MS plaques.
  • Most MS patients are women, and most of those have onset of the disease between ages 20 and 40. That is, most MS patients are sexually active women of childbearing age.
    • MS is rare in girls prior to the age of sexual debut.
  • Other risk factors for the development of MS include smoking, Caucasian race, and low vitamin D levels.
  • MS is not primarily a genetic disease. That is, heritability is relatively low, only 10-30% inheritance in twin studies.
    • The most important genetic influence on the development of MS is the HLA DRB1 gene, and particularly the allele DRB1*1501 which confers a threefold increase in the risk of developing MS. These HLA-DRB gene products are human proteins found on macrophages that bind and present antigens to T-lymphocytes. This is an important function for the immune system because HLA-DRB allows the recognition of foreign things, like microbes, that need to be eliminated.
 
Notice that MS is not identified here as an “autoimmune” disease. While many persons in the field believe that MS is an autoimmune disease, no clearcut “autoimmune antigen” has ever been identified. The current enthusiasm among scientists for myelin, for instance, as the target of the immune system in MS must be tempered by the realization that the oligoclonal bands (antibodies) in the spinal fluid of MS patients generally do not target myelin. More on this subject later . . .
 
Here are the things we have shown in our lab, and can be relatively sure about (i.e. additional facts):
  • Some microbial sequences in MS-affected brain plaques are overexpressed. That is, they are more abundant than in the control brain tissues.
    • These overexpressed microbial sequences map mostly to bacteria, and many of those to anerobic bacteria. These bacteria have niches in the human gut, vagina, and skin.
  • Spinal fluid taken from MS patients binds to many of the bacteria we have studied. This binding is well above the level seen in spinal fluid taken from persons without MS (the controls).
 
These two things – overexpressed microbial sequences and spinal fluid antibodies against some of these microbes – make us much more enthused about the idea that microbes might be causing MS.
 
Here are some things we don’t know, but would like to find out:
  • Are the microbes present in MS brain lesions actually alive? That is, are they:
    • Replicating and causing trouble?
    • Not replicating?
  • How did these microbial sequences, mapping mostly to bacteria, get into brain tissue?
    • Did they get into brain tissue via the bloodstream? That is, was there bacteremic spread with deposition of microbes in the brain and/or spinal cord?
    • Were they dragged there by the macrophages present in all MS plaques? That is, if some of those macrophages were present in the gut-associated lymphatic tissue (GALT), did they pick up gut microbes, and drag them along to the brain when they were called there by the MS disease process?
  • Do the antibacterial antibodies that we have shown are present in the spinal fluid of MS patients correlate with their oligoclonal bands (OCBs)? That is, are OCBs directed against bacteria? If so, this would be strong evidence for specific microbial causes of the disease.
  • Are bacteria sometimes dormant in the brains of patients with MS, but they then switch to active replication? If so, this could explain the relapses often experienced by patients with MS: dormant, resting bacteria, no disease activity; replicating bacteria, relapse.​

​Thought Experiment – The Hot Pepper

Let’s think about MS in a different way, starting with a “thought experiment.” This is a hypothetical experiment that we just think about and never actually perform for reasons which will become obvious. Einstein used to do thought experiments to illustrate a point. As my family, friends, and colleagues will tell you, I am no Einstein, but let’s try this anyway.
 
Suppose I have a hot pepper. Maybe a jalepeno or habanero, but really hot. And it doesn’t really matter if the pepper is freshly picked and still alive, dead and dried out, or crushed, the result will be the same.
Picture
Let’s place that hot pepper into someone’s abdomen, say right below the liver on the right side. (This is analogous to a diseased gallbladder falling apart and leaking its contents into the abdomen.) That hot pepper will hurt because it’s irritating. The abdomen is not set up to accept such a nasty challenge from our hot pepper, and bad things will happen. There will be macrophages migrating in and trying to remove that pepper. 
Picture
And maybe this will work if it’s small enough to be easily eaten (phagocytosed) and removed. But if it’s large enough, the macrophage removal process will not be enough, and that pepper will fester. Surrounding tissue will be damaged and destroyed, and our unfortunate patient will have chronic pain, organ dysfunction, and maybe even perforation of the adjacent bowel (not good).
​
So how is this even remotely relevant to MS? Well, it is relevant because those microbial sequences we found in MS brain tissue are attached to their own little hot peppers. That is, they are made of microbial proteins, including one class that is really irritating – peptidoglycan. Peptidoglycans give ​bacterial cell walls their structure. Without them bacteria fall apart. And peptidoglycans are irritating, dead or alive. The immune system of animals and humans has evolved to detect and eradicate peptidoglycans.
​
Picture

​Think about it – we must keep bacteria out of our blood and tissues while still absorbing food surrounded by gut bacteria, and maintaining sexual function in the presence of skin and vaginal microbes. Our skin keeps the surrounding microbial world out, even when we stomp around in the mud. Thank you, skin.
Picture
Other researchers have shown specific antibodies against bacterial peptidoglycans in the spinal fluid of MS patients. When we took our MS candidate bacteria (identified by sequencing MS brain lesions) and sonicated them, their peptidoglycans were exposed. Therefore, we likely detected antibodies against peptidoglycans in the spinal fluid of MS patients. That is, MS patients are making an immune response to bacteria and bacterial peptidoglycan in their spinal fluid. It may not matter if the bacteria are alive or dead, whether they arrive from the bloodstream or from infiltrating macrophages, their presence (and their peptidoglycans) are doing evil.
 
The Microbial Hypothesis of MS
It’s hard to imagine that bacterial antigens (proteins), including peptidoglycan, in the brains of patients with MS are doing anything but raising havoc – inflammation, macrophage infiltration, and the destruction of an important bystander, myelin. That’s right, our view at Cracking the MS Code is that the MS disease process does not specifically target myelin. It targets bacteria and their antigens within brain tissue, and myelin is damaged in the process. Myelin is a bystander, injured by the inflammatory process surrounding it. If the bacterial antigens are removed quickly and completely, myelin and their enveloped axons may be preserved without any loss of function. If there is some damage to myelin, remyelination may occur. But if all the bacterial antigen cannot be removed, or if new bacterial antigen is formed due to replication of bacterial cells, the inflammation goes on, myelin is ruined and removed, axons are lost, and neurologic deficits ensue.
​

Picture
Neurosyphilis, Neuroborreliosis, and Neurologic Tuberculosis
 
MS is not the only disease with oligoclonal bands (OCBs) appearing in the patients’ spinal fluid. Neurosyphilis, syphilis that affects the brain or spinal cord, and neuroborreliosis, neurologic Lyme disease, are bacterial diseases that bear some resemblance to MS. Both of these bacterial infections can be insidious and chronic. Both often cause OCBs to form in the spinal fluid. However, the OCBs are directed against the infecting bacteria, not myelin. (Remember, these OCBs are really IgG antibodies made in the brain and/or spinal cord, so, of course, they are directed against the invading microbes.) And both neurosyphilis and neuroborreliosis (neurologic Lyme disease) can cause severe neurologic dysfunction and death. These bacterial brain infections can relapse even after treatment. And in neither disease can the causative bacteria be cultured directly from the spinal fluid. Diagnosis requires special serologic or molecular testing of the blood and spinal fluid.
 
Neurologic Lyme disease is inflammatory and can cause demyelination. The pathology of affected brain and spinal cord resembles MS in several ways, including the presence of demyelinated areas. The demyelinated area is circled (DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.01.024)


Picture
Picture
Neurologic tuberculosis is also interesting. This disease is “paucibacillary” (few bacteria). That is, a very few tubercle bacilli cause a terrible disease that is difficult to diagnose and hard to treat. Diagnosis requires culturing large volumes of spinal fluid for weeks or months to find the causative tubercle bacilli. If you catch them, you are lucky. Treatment is often started empirically (by a guess), and stopped later if all tests are negative. And treatment of neurologic TB requires suppression of the immune system to lessen the damage. These cases are treated with a combination of anti-tuberculosis drugs and steroids, usually prednisone. Months of treatment with these antibiotics and a slow taper of the steroids is required to control and cure the disease.
 
I offer this for your consideration because I want to see the bigger picture with MS:
What if MS is also a “paucibacillary” disease, usually caused by bacteria, a few or many different ones, that cannot be easily cultured from the spinal fluid, that may lay dormant and recur, and that must be diagnosed indirectly by serology?
 
Our lab at Cracking the MS Code aims to show that spinal fluid serology tests are the most effective way to diagnose and direct the treatment for developing MS. If this proves to be true, doctors could make early diagnoses and apply appropriate treatments including antibiotics to suppress or eradicate the inciting bacteria, with specific immunosuppressants to minimize the damage.
 
Can we actually cure cases of MS? I think this is possible, but we need to know exactly what we are facing. Guessing is not acceptable.
 
Next article: Who should we treat, and how can we do it? What are the chances of making these patients better or limiting the neurologic damage?

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Dr. John Kriesel is Associate Professor of Infectious Diseases at the University of Utah School of Medicine. ​He began this blog to raise awareness and generate discussion about the possible causes of multiple sclerosis.

    BLOG ETIQUETTE
    All readers are welcome to post replies and challenge ideas. Please respect the process and keep the dialog civil.
    subscribe to the blog
    Get involved
    donate to microbes in mS research

    Archives

    March 2021
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

THANKS FOR YOUR INTEREST

The opinions on this website are not necessarily those of the University of Utah. The site was assembled with private, not university funds. ​​This blog is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing or other professional health care services, including the giving of medical advice, and no doctor/patient relationship is formed. The use of information on this blog or materials linked from this blog is at the user’s own risk. The content of this blog is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard, or delay in obtaining, medical advice for any medical condition they may have and should seek the assistance of their health care professionals for any such conditions.

  • HOME
  • Blog
  • About
  • Our Project
  • GET INVOLVED